{
  "fields": [{"id":"_id","type":"int"},{"id":"measure_type_cd","type":"text"},{"id":"municipality_id","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Fiscal Year","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Program Area","type":"text"},{"id":"Municipality","type":"text"},{"id":"section_desc","type":"text"},{"id":"Measure Number","type":"text"},{"id":"Measure Name","type":"text"},{"id":"Numerator","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Denominator","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Result","type":"text"},{"id":"Notes","type":"text"},{"id":"MPMP Measure","type":"text"},{"id":"CAO Measure","type":"text"},{"id":"Publicly Reportable","type":"text"},{"id":"Measure Category","type":"text"},{"id":"Year Created","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Other","type":"text"},{"id":"Sort Sequence","type":"text"},{"id":"Influencing Factor","type":"text"}],
  "records": [
    [3,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV230","Total Number of Invoices Processed per $1,000,000 of Municipal Purchases (Operating and Capital) for Goods and Services",98943,548.26,"180.467","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2005,"Revised March 2017 - Formerly  named “ Total Numbe","Descending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [4,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV240","Average Dollars Spent per Procurement Card (P-card) Transaction",8946698,37952,"235.74","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"","Descending","2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [5,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV245","Percent of Payments that are Electronic",63040,98244,"0.642","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"Aug 2017 - measure name changed from ... Electroni","Descending","2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [6,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV317","Accounts Payable Operating Cost per Invoice Processed",568715,98943,"5.75","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Revised March 2017 - Formerly “Accounts Payable Op","Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [7,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV319","Accounts Payable Operating Cost per Accounts Payable FTE",568715,8,"71089.38","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2007,"March 2017 - Group would like to identify an opera","Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [8,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV325","Number of Invoices Processed per Accounts Payable FTE",98943,8,"12367","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Revised March 2017 - Formerly \"Number of Invoices","Descending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [9,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV410","Percent of Invoices Paid Within 30 Days",94129,98244,"0.958","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2005,"This is a customer service measure that represents","Descending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [10,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV415","Percent of Invoices Paid Between 31 and 60 Days",5505,98244,"0.056","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2005,"This is a customer service measure that represents","Ascending",""],
    [11,"accounts_payable",26000,2016,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV420","Percent of Invoices Paid 60 Days or Greater",1252,98244,"0.013","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2005,"This is a customer service measure that represents","Ascending",""],
    [14,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC105","Regulated Child Care Spaces in Municipality per 1,000 Children (12 and under)",11580,56.43,"205.21","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"Please note: If using OCCMS  to determine \"Total N","Descending","1. Demographics\r\n2. Licensed Spaces"],
    [15,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC110","Fee Subsidy Child Care Spaces per 1,000 LICO (low income cut-off) Children",1671,8.81,"189.67","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"Attempt to measure how well the economically chall","Descending","1. Demographics \r\n4. Funding \r\n5. Data Availability"],
    [16,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC112","Percent of Spaces that are Subsidized",1671,11580,"0.144","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2008,"","Descending","2. Licensed Spaces \r\n4. Funding"],
    [17,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC115","Percent of Children in the Municipality (12 and under) that are from Low Income Families (LICO)",8810,56430,"0.156","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2006,"To ensure consistency, it was agreed that for meas","Ascending","1. Demographics \r\n5. Data Availability"],
    [18,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC215","Number of Full Day Equivalent Subsidized Child Care Spaces (Normalized) per 1,000 LICO (low income cut-off) Children",2895,8.81,"328.604","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2004,"When submitting data – each municipality shall pro","Descending","3. Mix of Child Care Spaces\r\n4. Funding\r\n5. Data Availability"],
    [19,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC220","Operating Cost per Child (12 and under) in the Municipality",42879251,56430,"759.87","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2005,"Best Start Planning is to be included","Descending","2 Licensed Spaces\r\n3 Mix of Child Care Spaces:\r\n4 Funding:"],
    [20,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC220T","Total Cost per Child (12 and under) in the Municipality",42974291,56430,"762","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2009,"","Descending","2 Licensed Spaces\r\n3 Mix of Child Care Spaces:\r\n4 Funding:"],
    [21,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC225","Net Operating Cost (excluding subsidy and parent fees) per Child (12 and under) in the Municipality",7776274,56430,"137.8","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2005,"","Descending","2. Licensed Spaces\r\n3. Mix of Child Care Spaces\r\n4. Funding"],
    [22,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC225T","Total Net Operating Cost (excluding subsidy and parent fees) per Child (12 and under) in the Municipality",7871314,56430,"139.49","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2009,"","Descending","2. Licensed Spaces\r\n3. Mix of Child Care Spaces\r\n4. Funding"],
    [23,"Child Care",26000,2016,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC305","Annual Child Care Cost per Normalized Subsidized Child Care Space",19563068,2895,"6757.54","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2004,"Determining the cost of subsidized spaces.  Does n","Ascending","1 Demographics:\r\n3 Mix of Child Care Spaces:"],
    [27,"Clerks",26000,2016,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS270","Number of Formal Freedom of Information (Legislated Freedom of Information Program) Requests per 100,000 Population",110,4.538,"24.24","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2006,"Each partner is to follow their respective provinc","Descending","8. Citizen Engagement\r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues\r\n11. Nature of Requests\r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [28,"Clerks",26000,2016,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS318","Operating Cost for Access and Privacy Programs per $1,000 Municipal Operating Expenses",177937.42,756510,"0.24","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Feb 2016 - Moved to publicly reportable\r\nAccess an","Ascending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [29,"Clerks",26000,2016,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS321","Access and Privacy Staff Cost per Capita",205726.1,453817,"0.45","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Moved to publicly reportable - Dec 12, 2013\r\n\r\nAug","Ascending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [30,"Clerks",26000,2016,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS370","Operating Cost for Freedom of Information Program per Formal Request",106765,110,"971","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2006,"Graph single and upper-tier separately.\r\n\r\nNB: Dis","Ascending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [31,"Clerks",26000,2016,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS470","Percent of Formal Freedom of Information Requests Handled Within 30 Days",97,110,"0.882","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2006,"","Descending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [32,"Clerks",26000,2016,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS475","Percent of Formal Freedom of Information Requests, Extensions and 3rd Party Notices Handled within Legislated Timelines",108,110,"0.982","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2013,"","Descending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [38,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS009","Override Population Density",453817,1896,"239.35","","No","No","Yes","Statistic",2007,"","Descending",""],
    [39,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS105","Return of Pulse Upon Arrival at Hospital Following Medical Cardiac Arrest",94,301,"0.312","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2002,"","Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [40,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS113","Percent of EMS Responses Returned as CTAS 1 that are Captured by Advanced Care Paramedics (ACP",743,855,"0.869","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2015,"February 2015 - New Measure\r\nFebruary 2016 - moved","Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [41,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS114","Percent of EMS Responses Returned as CTAS 2 that are Captured by Advanced Care Paramedics (ACP)",7296,9222,"0.791","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2015,"February 2015 - New Measure\r\nFebruary 2016 - moved","Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [42,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS135","EMS Unit Hour Activity Codes 1 through 4",64561,216276,"0.299","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2005,"T3 - TMAX time\r\n. Case Study, set targets\r\nFeb 201","Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [43,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS150","Percent of Ambulance Time Lost to Hospital Turnaround",31385,227403.5,"0.138","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2006,"Evaluating means of including PRU time lost; Some","Ascending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [44,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS155","Percent of Ambulance Time in Excess of Standard 30 Minutes Lost to Hospital Turnaround",18948.1,31385,"0.604","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2008,"Evaluating means of including PRU time lost; Some","Ascending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [45,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS226","EMS Weighted Vehicle In-Service Hours per 1,000 Population",206639,453.817,"455","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2006,"New measure - replaces EMDS225A which included sup","Descending","1. Community Services \r\n4. Governance \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural"],
    [46,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS229","Unique Responses per 1,000 Population",68620,453.82,"151.21","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2005,"","Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [47,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS236","EMS Vehicle Unique Response One per Scene: Codes 1 through 4, per Municipal Sq Km",68620,1896,"36.2","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2007,"","Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [48,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS246","Total EMS Patients Transported - Codes 1 through 4 per 1,000 Population",43525,453.817,"95.91","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2003,"Source:  Common OMBI Query + FIR","Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [49,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS256","EMS Operating Cost per 1,000 Population",39638843,453.817,"87345.43","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2009,"","Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [50,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS256T","EMS Total Cost per 1,000 Population",42030237,453.817,"92615","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2014,"Feb 2016 - moved to publicly reportable","Descending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [51,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS260","Percent of EMS Hours Staffed by Advance Care Paramedics (ACP)",182091,487211,"0.374","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2002,"Uses actual payroll data to calculate what percent","Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [52,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS306","EMS Operating Cost per Weighted Vehicle In-Service Hour",39638843,206639,"192","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2015,"","Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [53,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS306T","EMS Total Cost per Weighted Vehicle In-Service Hour",42030237,206639,"203","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2015,"New measure replacing 305T which included supervis","Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [54,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS321","EMS Operating Cost per Patient Transported (Codes 1 through 4, and All AMPDS)",39638843,43525,"910.71","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Note: Need to be sure dispatch costs and costs of","Ascending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [55,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS321T","EMS Total Cost per Patient Transported (Codes 1 through 4 and All AMPDS)",42030237,43525,"965.66","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2009,"","Ascending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [56,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS430","Response Time Performance Standard - Sudden Cardiac Arrest Within Six Minutes (SCA within 6 minutes)",0.55,0.5497,"0.5497","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2014,"","Descending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [57,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS431","Response Time Performance Standard - Canadian Triage & Acuity 1 (CTAS 1)",0.8,0.7566,"0.7566","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2014,"","Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [60,"EMS (CF)",26000,2016,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS478","Percent of Codes 3-4 that have a CTAS Value Recorded on Transport",41972,54206,"0.7743","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2012,"Helps interpret measures 460 and 462\r\nFeb 2016 - m","Ascending","3. Dispatch"],
    [66,"Facilities",26000,2016,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT106","Electricity Consumption (kWh) for Headquarters (HQ) per Square Foot of HQ  Building",2388578.01,195310,"12.23","","No","No","Yes","Statistic",2012,"Feb 2016 - move to \"Internal Use Only\" when availa","Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [67,"Facilities",26000,2016,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT111","Natural Gas Consumption in Equivalent kwh for Headquarters (HQ) per Square Foot of HQ Building",1512957.27,195310,"7.75","","No","No","Yes","Statistic",2012,"Feb 2016 - move to \"Internal Use Only\" when availa","Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [68,"Facilities",26000,2016,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT240","Total Equivalent kWh Energy Consumption  per Square Foot of Headquarter Building",3901535.28,195310,"20","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2014,"","Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [69,"Facilities",26000,2016,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT335","Operating Cost of Facility Operations for Headquarter Building (HQ) per Square Feet of HQ Building",1270091.97,195310,"6.5","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2014,"Do not include debt costs","Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [70,"Facilities",26000,2016,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT335T","Total Cost of Facility Operations per Square Feet of Headquarter Building (HQ)",2539435.28,195310,"13","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2014,"","Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [73,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET100","Total Litres of Fuel Consumed per 100 Km (Light Duty Vehicles)",428022.11,26206.3,"16.33","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2010,"","Ascending",""],
    [74,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET105","Total Litres of Fuel Consumed per 100 Km (Medium Duty Vehicles)",99867.38,3674.21,"27.181","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2010,"","Ascending",""],
    [75,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET110","Total Litres of Fuel Consumed per 100 Km (Heavy Duty Vehicles)",285121.79,5776.74,"49.4","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2010,"","Ascending",""],
    [79,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET227A","Average Age in Years - Light Vehicles - Municipal Equipment",981.2,156,"6.3","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"","Descending",""],
    [81,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET228A","Average Age in Years - Medium Vehicles - Municipal Equipment",173.4,20,"8.7","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"","Descending",""],
    [83,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET229A","Average Age in Years - Heavy Vehicles - Municipal Equipment",129.3,31,"4.2","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"","Descending",""],
    [84,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET306","Operating Cost per Light Vehicle KM (EMS)",125646,452631,"0.28","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"All in costs","Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [85,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET309","Operating Cost per Ambulance KM (EMS)",794427.6,1839741,"0.43","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"All in costs","Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [86,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET326","Operating Cost per Vehicle KM (Municipal Equipment)",1568997.03,3565725,"0.44","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"All in costs; all equipment","Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [87,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET327","Operating Cost per Light Vehicle KM (Municipal Equipment)",781461.02,2620630,"0.3","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"All in costs","Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [88,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET328","Operating Cost per Medium Vehicle KM (Municipal Equipment)",181106.99,367421,"0.49","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"All in costs","Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [89,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET329","Operating Cost per Heavy KM (Municipal Equipment)",606429.02,577674,"1.05","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"All in costs","Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [91,"Fleet",26000,2016,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET415","Service Request Rate: Percent of Non PM (Planned or Preventative Maintenance)  Work Order Hours",5483,9623,"0.57","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2012,"","Ascending",""],
    [94,"Gen. Government (MPM",26000,2016,"General Government (MPMP)","Niagara","Input","GENG901","Operating Costs for Governance and Corporate Management as a Percent of Total Municipal Operating Costs",8725384,755947942,"0.0115","","Yes","No","Yes","Efficiency",2002,"","Ascending","1. Full-time vs. part time Councils\r\n2. Level of Government\r\n3. Organizational Form"],
    [95,"Gen. Government (MPM",26000,2016,"General Government (MPMP)","Niagara","Input","GENG901T","Total Cost for Governance and Corporate Management as a Percent of Total Municipal Costs",14461694,821445313,"0.0176","","Yes","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"","Ascending",""],
    [96,"general_revenue",26000,2016,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV210","Total Percent of General Revenues Billed",66455324,381684024,"0.174","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2006,"","Descending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [97,"general_revenue",26000,2016,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV310","Operating Cost of Accounts Receivable Function per Invoice",365601,62154,"5.88","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2006,"Costs Include:  All costs: cash receipts, billings","Ascending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [98,"general_revenue",26000,2016,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV320","Percent of Billings Outstanding Over 90 Days at Year End",2986513,26076224,"0.11","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2006,"Year end closing balance as reported\r\nFeb 2016 - m","Ascending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [99,"general_revenue",26000,2016,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV325","Bad Debt Write Off as a Percent of Billed Revenue",168089,66455324,"0.003","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2006,"","Ascending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [100,"general_revenue",26000,2016,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV335","Average Collection Period in Days",365,3.79,"96.31","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2006,"May 2016-The Accounts Receivable balance includes","Ascending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [104,"Hostels",26000,2016,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL105","Average Length of Stay in Days per Admission to Emergency Shelters (Adults and Children)",68257,5694,"12","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"HSTL105 is not a roll-up measure of HSTL115  plus","Ascending","1.\tAncillary services\r\n2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n3.\tClimate\r\n4.\tClient Profile\r\n5.\tSupply vs. demand\r\n6.\tPolitical Climate\r\n7.\tOther Housing Services\r\n8.\tAvailability\r\n9.\tImmigration\r\n10.\tInformation Systems\r\n11.\tVacancy Rates in Rental Properties"],
    [105,"Hostels",26000,2016,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL110","Average Length of Stay in Days per Admission to Emergency Shelters (Singles)",45736,4805,"9.5","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"","Ascending","1.\tAncillary services\r\n2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n3.\tClimate\r\n4.\tClient Profile\r\n5.\tSupply vs. demand\r\n6.\tPolitical Climate\r\n7.\tOther Housing Services\r\n8.\tAvailability\r\n9.\tImmigration\r\n10.\tInformation Systems\r\n11.\tVacancy Rates in Rental Properties"],
    [106,"Hostels",26000,2016,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL115","Average Length of Stay in Days per Admission to Emergency Shelters (Families)",6146,271,"22.7","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"","Ascending","1.\tAncillary services\r\n2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n3.\tClimate\r\n4.\tClient Profile\r\n5.\tSupply vs. demand\r\n6.\tPolitical Climate\r\n7.\tOther Housing Services\r\n8.\tAvailability\r\n9.\tImmigration\r\n10.\tInformation Systems\r\n11.\tVacancy Rates in Rental Properties"],
    [107,"Hostels",26000,2016,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL205","Average Nightly Number of Emergency Shelter Beds Available per 100,000 Population",192,4.538,"42.3","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2004,"","Descending","2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n6.\tPolitical Climate"],
    [108,"Hostels",26000,2016,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL216","Percent of Contracted Emergency Shelter Beds Available",192,192,"1","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2006,"Results can be influenced by significant events in","Descending","2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n3.\tClimate\r\n6.\tPolitical Climate"],
    [109,"Hostels",26000,2016,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL310","Operating Cost of Emergency Shelter Program per 100,000 Population",2319162,4.538,"511053.77","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2016,"New measure April 2017 - replaces HSTL310T","Ascending","To be determined"],
    [112,"Human Resources",26000,2016,"Human Resources","Niagara","Input","HMRS305T","Total Cost for Human Resources Administration per T4 Supported",3017231,4213,"716","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2014,"","Ascending",""],
    [113,"Human Resources",26000,2016,"Human Resources","Niagara","Input","HMRS406","Overall Permanent Voluntary Employee Turnover",305,3409,"0.0895","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2008,"Feb 2016 - move to 'Internal Use Only' when catego","Ascending",""]
]}