{
  "fields": [{"id":"_id","type":"int"},{"id":"measure_type_cd","type":"text"},{"id":"municipality_id","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Fiscal Year","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Program Area","type":"text"},{"id":"Municipality","type":"text"},{"id":"section_desc","type":"text"},{"id":"Measure Number","type":"text"},{"id":"Measure Name","type":"text"},{"id":"Numerator","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Denominator","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Result","type":"text"},{"id":"Notes","type":"text"},{"id":"MPMP Measure","type":"text"},{"id":"CAO Measure","type":"text"},{"id":"Publicly Reportable","type":"text"},{"id":"Measure Category","type":"text"},{"id":"Year Created","type":"numeric"},{"id":"Sort Sequence","type":"text"},{"id":"Influencing Factor","type":"text"}],
  "records": [
    [3,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV230","Total Number of Invoices Paid per $1,000,000 of Municipal Purchases (Operating and Capital) for Goods and Services",92015,421.32,"218.397","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2005,"Descending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [4,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV240","Average Dollars Spent per Procurement Card (P-card) Transaction",8230618.07,43910,"187.44","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"Descending","2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [5,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV245","Percent of Payments that are Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT)",45038,92015,"0.489","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"Descending","2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [6,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV317","Accounts Payable Operating Cost per Invoice Paid",529461,92015,"5.75","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [7,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV319","Accounts Payable Operating Cost per Accounts Payable FTE",529461,7.2,"73536.25","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2007,"Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [8,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV325","Number of Invoices Paid per Accounts Payable FTE",92015,7.2,"12779","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Descending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [9,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV410","Percent of Invoices Paid Within 30 Days",71059,92015,"0.772","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2005,"Descending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices \r\n3.\tProcesses & Systems"],
    [10,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV415","Percent of Invoices Paid Between 31 and 60 Days",15377,92015,"0.167","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2005,"Ascending",""],
    [11,"accounts_payable",26000,2015,"Accounts Payable","Niagara","Accounts Payable","FINV420","Percent of Invoices Paid 60 Days or Greater",5579,92015,"0.061","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2005,"Ascending",""],
    [12,"general_revenue",26000,2015,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV210","Total Percent of General Revenues Billed",64521554,391563886,"0.165","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2006,"Descending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [13,"general_revenue",26000,2015,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV310","Operating Cost of Accounts Receivable Function per Invoice",294412,30409,"9.68","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2006,"Ascending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [14,"general_revenue",26000,2015,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV320","Percent of Billings Outstanding Over 90 Days at Year End",1898459,41867276,"0.05","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2006,"Ascending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [15,"general_revenue",26000,2015,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV325","Bad Debt Write Off as a Percent of Billed Revenue",141079,64521554,"0.002","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2006,"Ascending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [16,"general_revenue",26000,2015,"General Revenue","Niagara","General Revenue","GREV335","Average Collection Period in Days",365,4.41,"82.77","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2006,"Ascending","1.\tGovernment Structure\r\n2.\tPolicy and Practices\r\n3.\tProcesses and Systems"],
    [19,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC105","Regulated Child Care Spaces in Municipality per 1,000 Children (12 and under)",11128,56.43,"197.2","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"Descending","1. Demographics\r\n2. Licensed Spaces"],
    [20,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC110","Fee Subsidy Child Care Spaces per 1,000 LICO (low income cut-off) Children",1693,8.39,"201.79","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"Descending","1. Demographics \r\n4. Funding \r\n5. Data Availability"],
    [21,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC112","Percent of Spaces that are Subsidized",1693,11128,"0.152","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2008,"Descending","2. Licensed Spaces \r\n4. Funding"],
    [22,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC115","Percent of Children in the Municipality (12 and under) that are from Low Income Families (LICO)",8390,56430,"0.149","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2006,"Ascending","1. Demographics \r\n5. Data Availability"],
    [23,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC215","Number of Full Day Equivalent Subsidized Child Care Spaces (Normalized) per 1,000 LICO (low income cut-off) Children",2902,8.39,"345.888","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2004,"Descending","3. Mix of Child Care Spaces\r\n4. Funding\r\n5. Data Availability"],
    [24,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC220","Operating Cost per Child (12 and under) in the Municipality",39828916,56430,"705.81","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2005,"Descending","2 Licensed Spaces\r\n3 Mix of Child Care Spaces:\r\n4 Funding:"],
    [25,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC220T","Total Cost per Child (12 and under) in the Municipality",39921556,56430,"707","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2009,"Descending","2 Licensed Spaces\r\n3 Mix of Child Care Spaces:\r\n4 Funding:"],
    [26,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC225","Net Operating Cost (excluding subsidy and parent fees) per Child (12 and under) in the Municipality",7994239,56430,"141.67","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2005,"Descending","2. Licensed Spaces\r\n3. Mix of Child Care Spaces\r\n4. Funding"],
    [27,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC225T","Total Net Operating Cost (excluding subsidy and parent fees) per Child (12 and under) in the Municipality",8086879,56430,"143.31","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2009,"Descending","2. Licensed Spaces\r\n3. Mix of Child Care Spaces\r\n4. Funding"],
    [28,"Child Care",26000,2015,"Child Care","Niagara","Input","CHDC305","Annual Child Care Cost per Normalized Subsidized Child Care Space",18832536,2902,"6489.5","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2004,"Ascending","1 Demographics:\r\n3 Mix of Child Care Spaces:"],
    [33,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS270","Number of Formal Freedom of Information (Legislated Freedom of Information Program) Requests per 100,000 Population",132,4.491,"29.39","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2006,"Descending","8. Citizen Engagement\r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues\r\n11. Nature of Requests\r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [34,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS316","Operating Cost to Support Council and Committees per $1,000 Municipal Operating Expenses",643800.49,778420.99,"0.83","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Ascending","1. Citizen Participation\r\n 2. Complexity \r\n3. Council Authority \r\n4. Government Structure \r\n5. Organizational Form.\r\n6. Political Climate\r\n7. Practices and Processes"],
    [35,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS317","Operating Cost for Records and Information Management per $1,000 Municipal Operating Expenses",138360.95,778420.99,"0.18","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Ascending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [36,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS318","Operating Cost for Access and Privacy Programs per $1,000 Municipal Operating Expenses",175665.93,778420.99,"0.23","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Ascending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [37,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS319","Council and Committee Staff Cost per Capita",601791.32,449098,"1.34","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Ascending","1. Citizen Participation\r\n 2. Complexity \r\n3. Council Authority \r\n4. Government Structure \r\n5. Organizational Form.\r\n6. Political Climate\r\n7. Practices and Processes"],
    [38,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS320","Records and Information Management Staff Cost per Capita",159754.89,449098,"0.36","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Ascending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [39,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS321","Access and Privacy Staff Cost per Capita",206663.82,449098,"0.46","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Ascending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [40,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS370","Operating Cost for Freedom of Information Program per Formal Request",105400,132,"798","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2006,"Ascending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [41,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS470","Percent of Regular Formal Freedom of Information Requests Handled Within 30 Days",102,132,"0.773","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2006,"Descending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [42,"Clerks",26000,2015,"Clerks","Niagara","Input","CLKS475","Percent of Regular Formal Freedom of Information Requests, Extensions and 3rd Party Notices Handled within Legislated Timelines",127,132,"0.962","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2013,"Descending","8. Citizen Engagement \r\n9. Complexity\r\n10. Contentious Issues \r\n11. Nature of Requests \r\n12. Organizational Form\r\n13. Political Climate.\r\n14. Practices & Policies\r\n15. Privacy Protection"],
    [48,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS009","Override Population Density",449098,1896,"236.87","","No","No","Yes","Statistic",2007,"Descending",""],
    [49,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS105","Return of Pulse Upon Arrival at Hospital Following Medical Cardiac Arrest",87,270,"0.322","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2002,"Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [50,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS112","Percent of EMS Responses Returned as CTAS 1 and 2 that are Captured by Advanced Care Paramedics (ACP)",8051,9938,"0.81","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2014,"Descending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [51,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS113","Percent of EMS Responses Returned as CTAS 1 that are Captured by Advanced Care Paramedics (ACP",715,804,"0.889","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2015,"Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [52,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS114","Percent of EMS Responses Returned as CTAS 2 that are Captured by Advanced Care Paramedics (ACP)",7336,9134,"0.803","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2015,"Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [53,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS135","EMS Unit Hour Activity Codes 1 through 4",57451,196663,"0.292","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2005,"Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [54,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS150","Percent of Ambulance Time Lost to Hospital Turnaround",25793,205247.5,"0.126","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2006,"Ascending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [55,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS155","Percent of Ambulance Time in Excess of Standard 30 Minutes Lost to Hospital Turnaround",12947.7,25793,"0.502","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2008,"Ascending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [56,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS226","EMS Weighted Vehicle In-Service Hours per 1,000 Population",206639,449,"460","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2006,"Descending","1. Community Services \r\n4. Governance \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural"],
    [57,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS229","Unique Responses per 1,000 Population",62027,449,"138.14","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2005,"Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [58,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS236","EMS Vehicle Unique Response One per Scene: Codes 1 through 4, per Municipal Sq Km",62027,1896,"32.7","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2007,"Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [59,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS246","Total EMS Patients Transported - Codes 1 through 4 per 1,000 Population",42040,449,"93.63","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2003,"Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [60,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS256","EMS Operating Cost per 1,000 Population",36464238,449,"81212.11","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2009,"Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [61,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS256T","EMS Total Cost per 1,000 Population",38382617,449,"85485","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2014,"Descending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [62,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS260","Percent of EMS Hours Staffed by Advance Care Paramedics (ACP)",193254,436805,"0.442","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2002,"Descending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [63,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS306","EMS Operating Cost per Weighted Vehicle In-Service Hour",36464238,206639,"176","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2015,"Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [64,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS306T","EMS Total Cost per Weighted Vehicle In-Service Hour",38382617,206639,"186","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2015,"Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [65,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS321","EMS Operating Cost per Patient Transported (Codes 1 through 4, and All AMPDS)",36464238,42040,"867.37","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Ascending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [66,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS321T","EMS Total Cost per Patient Transported (Codes 1 through 4 and All AMPDS)",38382617,42040,"913","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2009,"Ascending","1.\tCommunity Services \r\n2.\tDemographics \r\n3.\tDispatch \r\n4.\tGovernance \r\n5.\tHospital Delay \r\n6.\tNon Residents \r\n7.\tUrban vs. Rural \r\n8.\tVehicle Mix"],
    [67,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS430","Response Time Performance Standard SCA within six (6) minutes",0.55,0.5772,"0.5772","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2014,"Descending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [68,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS431","Response Time Performance Standard CTAS 1",0.8,0.7715,"0.7715","","No","Yes","Yes","Customer Service",2014,"Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [69,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS432","Response Time Performance Standard CTAS 2",0.8,0.8472,"0.8472","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2014,"Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [70,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS433","Response Time Performance Standard CTAS  3",0.9,0.8991,"0.8991","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2014,"Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [71,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS434","Response Time Performance Standard CTAS 4",0.9,0.9478,"0.9478","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2014,"Ascending",""],
    [72,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS435","Response Time Performance Standard CTAS 5",0.9,0.9959,"0.9959","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2014,"Ascending","1. Community Services \r\n2. Demographics \r\n3. Dispatch \r\n4. Governance \r\n5. Hospital Delay \r\n6. Non Residents \r\n7. Urban vs. Rural \r\n8. Vehicle Mix"],
    [75,"EMS (CF)",26000,2015,"EMS (CF)","Niagara","Input","EMDS478","Percent of Codes 3-4 that have a CTAS Value Recorded on Transport",41972,53882,"0.779","","No","No","Yes","Customer Service",2012,"Ascending","3. Dispatch"],
    [81,"Facilities",26000,2015,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT106","Electricity Consumption (kWh) for Headquarters (HQ) per Square Foot of HQ  Building",2080698.7,195310,"10.65","","No","No","Yes","Statistic",2012,"Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [82,"Facilities",26000,2015,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT111","Natural Gas Consumption in Equivalent kwh for Headquarters (HQ) per Square Foot of HQ Building",1549322.5,195310,"7.93","","No","No","Yes","Statistic",2012,"Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [83,"Facilities",26000,2015,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT240","Total Equivalent kWh Energy Consumption for Headquarters (HQ) per Square Foot of HQ Building",3630021.2,195310,"18.6","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2014,"Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [84,"Facilities",26000,2015,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT335","Operating Cost of Facility Operations for Headquarter Building (HQ) per Square Feet of HQ Building",1252652.2,195310,"6.41","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2014,"Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [85,"Facilities",26000,2015,"Facilities","Niagara","Input","FCLT335T","Total Cost of Facility Operations for Headquarter Building (HQ) per Square Feet of HQ Building",2588768.84,195310,"13.25","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2014,"Ascending","1.\tOrganizational Form\r\n2.\tBuilding Stock"],
    [88,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET100","Total Litres of Fuel Consumed per 100 Km (Light Duty Vehicles)",415898,24259.1,"17.14","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2010,"Ascending",""],
    [89,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET105","Total Litres of Fuel Consumed per 100 Km (Medium Duty Vehicles)",105029,3969.62,"26.458","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2010,"Ascending",""],
    [90,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET110","Total Litres of Fuel Consumed per 100 Km (Heavy Duty Vehicles)",236644,4374.34,"54.1","","No","No","Yes","Community Impact",2010,"Ascending",""],
    [99,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET227A","Average Age in Years - Light Vehicles - Municipal Equipment",794,132,"6","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"Descending",""],
    [101,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET228A","Average Age in Years - Medium Vehicles - Municipal Equipment",174,22,"7.9","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"Descending",""],
    [103,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET229A","Average Age in Years - Heavy Vehicles - Municipal Equipment",94,22,"4.3","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2008,"Descending",""],
    [106,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET326","Operating Cost per Vehicle KM (Municipal Equipment)",1506953,3260305,"0.46","","No","No","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [107,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET327","Operating Cost per Light Vehicle KM (Municipal Equipment)",752550,2425909,"0.31","","No","","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [108,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET328","Operating Cost per Medium Vehicle KM (Municipal Equipment)",199625,396962,"0.5","","No","","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [109,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET329","Operating Cost per Heavy KM (Municipal Equipment)",554778,437434,"1.27","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2005,"Ascending","2.\tFleet Mix and Usage \r\n4.\tPolicy and Processes"],
    [111,"Fleet",26000,2015,"Fleet & Management Services","Niagara","Input","FLET415","Service Request Rate - Percent of Non PM (Planned or Preventative Maintenance)  Work Order Hours",5840,9425,"0.62","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2012,"Ascending",""],
    [114,"Gen. Government (MPM",26000,2015,"General Government (MPMP)","Niagara","Input","GENG901","Operating Costs for Governance and Corporate Management as a Percent of Total Municipal Operating Costs",7659448,756121396,"0.0101","","Yes","No","Yes","Efficiency",2002,"Ascending","1. Full-time vs. part time Councils\r\n2. Level of Government\r\n3. Organizational Form"],
    [115,"Gen. Government (MPM",26000,2015,"General Government (MPMP)","Niagara","Input","GENG901T","Total Cost for Governance and Corporate Management as a Percent of Total Municipal Costs",9232146,833812914,"0.0111","","Yes","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2012,"Ascending",""],
    [118,"Human Resources",26000,2015,"Human Resources","Niagara","Input","HMRS305T","Total Cost for Human Resources Administration per T4 Supported",3073140,4066,"756","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2014,"Ascending",""],
    [119,"Human Resources",26000,2015,"Human Resources","Niagara","Input","HMRS406","Overall Permanent Voluntary Employee Turnover",195,3399,"0.0574","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2008,"Ascending",""],
    [123,"Hostels",26000,2015,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL105","Average Length of Stay in Days per Admission to Emergency Shelters (Adults and Children)",56565,4527,"12.5","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"Ascending","1.\tAncillary services\r\n2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n3.\tClimate\r\n4.\tClient Profile\r\n5.\tSupply vs. demand\r\n6.\tPolitical Climate\r\n7.\tOther Housing Services\r\n8.\tAvailability\r\n9.\tImmigration\r\n10.\tInformation Systems\r\n11.\tVacancy Rates in Rental Properties"],
    [124,"Hostels",26000,2015,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL110","Average Length of Stay in Days per Admission to Emergency Shelters (Singles)",37899,3546,"10.7","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"Ascending","1.\tAncillary services\r\n2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n3.\tClimate\r\n4.\tClient Profile\r\n5.\tSupply vs. demand\r\n6.\tPolitical Climate\r\n7.\tOther Housing Services\r\n8.\tAvailability\r\n9.\tImmigration\r\n10.\tInformation Systems\r\n11.\tVacancy Rates in Rental Properties"],
    [125,"Hostels",26000,2015,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL115","Average Length of Stay in Days per Admission to Emergency Shelters (Families)",4850,261,"18.6","","No","Yes","Yes","Community Impact",2004,"Ascending","1.\tAncillary services\r\n2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n3.\tClimate\r\n4.\tClient Profile\r\n5.\tSupply vs. demand\r\n6.\tPolitical Climate\r\n7.\tOther Housing Services\r\n8.\tAvailability\r\n9.\tImmigration\r\n10.\tInformation Systems\r\n11.\tVacancy Rates in Rental Properties"],
    [126,"Hostels",26000,2015,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL205","Average Nightly Number of Emergency Shelter Beds Available per 100,000 Population",192,4.491,"42.8","","No","Yes","Yes","Service Level",2004,"Descending","2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n6.\tPolitical Climate"],
    [127,"Hostels",26000,2015,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL216","Percent of Contracted Emergency Shelter Beds Available",192,192,"1","","No","No","Yes","Service Level",2006,"Descending","2.\tMunicipal Policy \r\n3.\tClimate\r\n6.\tPolitical Climate"],
    [128,"Hostels",26000,2015,"Emergency Hostels","Niagara","Input","HSTL310T","Not Used - Total Cost of Emergency Shelter Responses per 100,000 Population",2496217,4.491,"555826.54","","No","Yes","Yes","Efficiency",2016,"Ascending","To be determined"]
]}